<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 9 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347252</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on the appellant, a company proprietor, due to insufficient evidence connecting him to the alleged illegal import of hazardous goods. The Revenue failed to establish the appellant&#039;s involvement, leading to the appeal&#039;s success and the overturning of the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2017 07:46:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=487683" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 9 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347252</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on the appellant, a company proprietor, due to insufficient evidence connecting him to the alleged illegal import of hazardous goods. The Revenue failed to establish the appellant&#039;s involvement, leading to the appeal&#039;s success and the overturning of the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347252</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>