<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 6 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347249</link>
    <description>Section 52 of the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2003 was upheld as a valid State taxing provision under the doctrine of pith and substance because its deeming fiction operated only for VAT purposes to prevent tax evasion and did not alter the legal effect of amalgamation under the Companies Act. The Court found no direct encroachment on the Union field relating to incorporation, regulation and winding up of companies, and any incidental overlap was permissible. Show cause notices for tax liability arising from transactions after the appointed date of amalgamation were also held valid, as the taxable events had accrued under the VAT regime and the liabilities were transferable to the amalgamated company under the scheme.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2017 10:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=487680" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 6 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347249</link>
      <description>Section 52 of the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2003 was upheld as a valid State taxing provision under the doctrine of pith and substance because its deeming fiction operated only for VAT purposes to prevent tax evasion and did not alter the legal effect of amalgamation under the Companies Act. The Court found no direct encroachment on the Union field relating to incorporation, regulation and winding up of companies, and any incidental overlap was permissible. Show cause notices for tax liability arising from transactions after the appointed date of amalgamation were also held valid, as the taxable events had accrued under the VAT regime and the liabilities were transferable to the amalgamated company under the scheme.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347249</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>