<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (3) TMI 53 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9746</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the Commissioner of Income-tax, upholding the validity of the assessment. The Court determined that the notice issued in the name of an individual was rectified when the assessee submitted to the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer, validating the assessment conducted in the capacity of a Hindu undivided family. Despite acknowledging the legal differentiation for tax purposes between an individual and a Hindu undivided family, the Court found the assessment to be valid based on the assessee&#039;s actions and submissions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=48768" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (3) TMI 53 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9746</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the Commissioner of Income-tax, upholding the validity of the assessment. The Court determined that the notice issued in the name of an individual was rectified when the assessee submitted to the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer, validating the assessment conducted in the capacity of a Hindu undivided family. Despite acknowledging the legal differentiation for tax purposes between an individual and a Hindu undivided family, the Court found the assessment to be valid based on the assessee&#039;s actions and submissions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9746</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>