https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347245 The court allowed the petition to quash the order for shifting the registered office of the petitioner company, directing the respondent to give effect to the Company Court's order regarding amalgamation. The court's decision indirectly addressed the need for an expedited hearing of the main matter, ensuring timely resolution of the scheme of arrangement and amalgamation issues. The impugned order by the Deputy Director was set aside due to inconsistencies with the Company Court's approved scheme of amalgamation, emphasizing the legal obligations created by judicial approvals. The court also quashed the Deputy Director's order, ensuring proper implementation of the Company Court's decision regarding the amalgamation process. en-us Mon, 21 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 01 Sep 2017 07:45:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347245 The court allowed the petition to quash the order for shifting the registered office of the petitioner company, directing the respondent to give effect to the Company Court's order regarding amalgamation. The court's decision indirectly addressed the need for an expedited hearing of the main matter, ensuring timely resolution of the scheme of arrangement and amalgamation issues. The impugned order by the Deputy Director was set aside due to inconsistencies with the Company Court's approved scheme of amalgamation, emphasizing the legal obligations created by judicial approvals. The court also quashed the Deputy Director's order, ensuring proper implementation of the Company Court's decision regarding the amalgamation process. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 21 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347245