<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 1148 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194201</link>
    <description>A pre-deposit direction in an appellate stay order required deposit of the proportionate service tax interest within eight weeks and contained a default clause for non-compliance. When the appellant neither appeared on the compliance date nor produced proof of the required deposit, the Tribunal applied the default clause and dismissed the appeal for failure to comply with the earlier order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2017 07:44:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=487669" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 1148 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194201</link>
      <description>A pre-deposit direction in an appellate stay order required deposit of the proportionate service tax interest within eight weeks and contained a default clause for non-compliance. When the appellant neither appeared on the compliance date nor produced proof of the required deposit, the Tribunal applied the default clause and dismissed the appeal for failure to comply with the earlier order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194201</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>