<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (2) TMI 113 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9744</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioners, setting aside the notices issued under section 148 of the Income-tax Act for the assessment years 1998-99 and 1999-2000. The court found that the reasons for reopening assessments did not stem from a failure to disclose material facts but were based on existing records. It noted discrepancies in the Assessing Officer&#039;s conclusions and dismissed reliance on certain documents as grounds for reopening. Ultimately, the court concluded that the notices for reassessment did not meet the necessary preconditions and quashed them, ruling in favor of the petitioners without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=48766" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (2) TMI 113 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9744</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioners, setting aside the notices issued under section 148 of the Income-tax Act for the assessment years 1998-99 and 1999-2000. The court found that the reasons for reopening assessments did not stem from a failure to disclose material facts but were based on existing records. It noted discrepancies in the Assessing Officer&#039;s conclusions and dismissed reliance on certain documents as grounds for reopening. Ultimately, the court concluded that the notices for reassessment did not meet the necessary preconditions and quashed them, ruling in favor of the petitioners without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9744</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>