https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194195 The Court held that District Consumer Forums and State Commissions do not have the power to set aside or review their own ex parte orders. The National Commission has specific powers for this under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The decision in Jyotsana's case was upheld, emphasizing that State Commissions lack the authority to recall ex parte orders. In Civil Appeal No. 4307 of 2007, the Court set aside the National Commission's ruling but agreed to restore a complaint for hearing. In Civil Appeal No. 8155 of 2001, the impugned order was set aside, directing the National Commission to dispose of the case within three months. en-us Fri, 19 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 07 Aug 2018 11:36:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194195 The Court held that District Consumer Forums and State Commissions do not have the power to set aside or review their own ex parte orders. The National Commission has specific powers for this under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The decision in Jyotsana's case was upheld, emphasizing that State Commissions lack the authority to recall ex parte orders. In Civil Appeal No. 4307 of 2007, the Court set aside the National Commission's ruling but agreed to restore a complaint for hearing. In Civil Appeal No. 8155 of 2001, the impugned order was set aside, directing the National Commission to dispose of the case within three months. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 19 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194195