<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1293 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347235</link>
    <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeals, remanding key issues to the AO for further verification. The penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was quashed, allowing the AO to recommence penalty proceedings after reassessment. Detailed verification and proper classification of transactions were emphasized to determine the accurate quantum of deemed dividend.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2017 16:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=487621" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1293 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347235</link>
      <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeals, remanding key issues to the AO for further verification. The penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was quashed, allowing the AO to recommence penalty proceedings after reassessment. Detailed verification and proper classification of transactions were emphasized to determine the accurate quantum of deemed dividend.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347235</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>