<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1288 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347230</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes, confirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions. The Tribunal emphasized that service tax liability is not an allowable deduction under Section 43B, and the genuineness of sundry creditors and bad debts were adequately verified and justified by the CIT(A).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2017 11:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=487611" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1288 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347230</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes, confirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions. The Tribunal emphasized that service tax liability is not an allowable deduction under Section 43B, and the genuineness of sundry creditors and bad debts were adequately verified and justified by the CIT(A).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347230</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>