<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (9) TMI 49 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9739</link>
    <description>The court concluded that the liability in question was contractual, not statutory, and accrued only upon final settlement in 1981, making it relevant to the assessment year 1982-83. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow the deduction of Rs. 2,76,419 was justified as the liability crystallized in the relevant year. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, confirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision and against the Revenue, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=48761" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (9) TMI 49 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9739</link>
      <description>The court concluded that the liability in question was contractual, not statutory, and accrued only upon final settlement in 1981, making it relevant to the assessment year 1982-83. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow the deduction of Rs. 2,76,419 was justified as the liability crystallized in the relevant year. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, confirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision and against the Revenue, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9739</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>