https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194189 Administrative transfer of a Sessions trial under constitutional superintendence was treated as permissible where it addressed practical difficulties and caused no prejudice, so the transferee court's jurisdiction and the trial's validity were upheld. Evidence already recorded before the earlier court remained usable after additional charges were framed and witnesses were further examined, because the appellants had been examined and cross-examined and no failure of justice was shown. Liability under Section 149 IPC was affirmed on the basis of membership of an unlawful assembly sharing a common object; proof of a separate overt act by each accused was not required, and minor inconsistencies did not displace the prosecution case. en-us Tue, 21 Mar 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 31 Aug 2017 14:26:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194189 Administrative transfer of a Sessions trial under constitutional superintendence was treated as permissible where it addressed practical difficulties and caused no prejudice, so the transferee court's jurisdiction and the trial's validity were upheld. Evidence already recorded before the earlier court remained usable after additional charges were framed and witnesses were further examined, because the appellants had been examined and cross-examined and no failure of justice was shown. Liability under Section 149 IPC was affirmed on the basis of membership of an unlawful assembly sharing a common object; proof of a separate overt act by each accused was not required, and minor inconsistencies did not displace the prosecution case. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 21 Mar 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194189