https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194186 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision to convict the appellant for attempting to cheat the complainant under s. 420 read with ss. 511 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The case involved the accused's false representation of duplicating currency notes to the complainant, leading to their arrest in a police trap. The Court rejected the appellant's arguments that there was no evidence of representation, only preparation, and the complainant was not deceived. The Court emphasized that the intent to cheat and the actions taken towards the offense constituted an attempt, regardless of the complainant's awareness, affirming the conviction. en-us Tue, 19 Apr 1960 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 31 Aug 2017 13:21:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194186 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision to convict the appellant for attempting to cheat the complainant under s. 420 read with ss. 511 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The case involved the accused's false representation of duplicating currency notes to the complainant, leading to their arrest in a police trap. The Court rejected the appellant's arguments that there was no evidence of representation, only preparation, and the complainant was not deceived. The Court emphasized that the intent to cheat and the actions taken towards the offense constituted an attempt, regardless of the complainant's awareness, affirming the conviction. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 19 Apr 1960 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194186