<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (2) TMI 705 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194185</link>
    <description>Devender Kumar Singla was convicted of cheating under Section 420 IPC by the High Court and the Supreme Court upheld this conviction, reducing his sentence to three months of imprisonment. Mala Singla was acquitted as her involvement in the fraudulent transaction was not sufficiently proven. The courts found that wrongful gain and loss were established, the transaction date was valid, and the evidentiary value of the receipt and delivery of shares supported the conviction. The stoppage of payment before the transaction date was deemed suspicious, leading to Devender&#039;s conviction and reduced sentence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2017 13:17:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=487587" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (2) TMI 705 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194185</link>
      <description>Devender Kumar Singla was convicted of cheating under Section 420 IPC by the High Court and the Supreme Court upheld this conviction, reducing his sentence to three months of imprisonment. Mala Singla was acquitted as her involvement in the fraudulent transaction was not sufficiently proven. The courts found that wrongful gain and loss were established, the transaction date was valid, and the evidentiary value of the receipt and delivery of shares supported the conviction. The stoppage of payment before the transaction date was deemed suspicious, leading to Devender&#039;s conviction and reduced sentence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194185</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>