<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (9) TMI 575 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194183</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the revision petition, affirming the jurisdiction of the Additional Sessions Judge, the validity of the procedural amendments, and the appropriateness of the sequence in handling the application for condonation of delay. The administrative orders transferring the case to the Sessions Court were upheld, and the delay in filing the complaint was properly condoned in the interest of justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2018 17:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=487580" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (9) TMI 575 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194183</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the revision petition, affirming the jurisdiction of the Additional Sessions Judge, the validity of the procedural amendments, and the appropriateness of the sequence in handling the application for condonation of delay. The administrative orders transferring the case to the Sessions Court were upheld, and the delay in filing the complaint was properly condoned in the interest of justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194183</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>