https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194178 An eviction claim based solely on the landlord's personal bona fide requirement under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act did not survive after the original petitioners died, because the pleaded need had to subsist until final adjudication and the legal representatives could not continue the case on an unpleaded different basis. The tenant could therefore not be evicted on that ground. Separately, the rent fixed by the High Court was found inadequate in light of the premises' nature, location, size, and prevailing rental indicators, so the rent was revised upward, while leaving the parties free to seek fair-rent determination before the competent forum. en-us Wed, 17 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 31 Aug 2017 11:40:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194178 An eviction claim based solely on the landlord's personal bona fide requirement under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act did not survive after the original petitioners died, because the pleaded need had to subsist until final adjudication and the legal representatives could not continue the case on an unpleaded different basis. The tenant could therefore not be evicted on that ground. Separately, the rent fixed by the High Court was found inadequate in light of the premises' nature, location, size, and prevailing rental indicators, so the rent was revised upward, while leaving the parties free to seek fair-rent determination before the competent forum. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 17 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194178