<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (2) TMI 1037 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194177</link>
    <description>Revisional jurisdiction under Section 15(5) of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act is broader than Section 115 CPC, but it is not appellate power and does not allow routine reappraisal of evidence or disturbance of concurrent findings of fact except for perversity, illegality, impropriety, or no-evidence errors. The High Court may also consider relevant subsequent events and admit a local Commissioner&#039;s report on the present physical condition of the premises where those later facts directly affect whether the accommodation is fit for human habitation. On that basis, the report of deterioration was treated as admissible and the interference with the finding on fitness was justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2017 11:31:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=487568" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (2) TMI 1037 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194177</link>
      <description>Revisional jurisdiction under Section 15(5) of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act is broader than Section 115 CPC, but it is not appellate power and does not allow routine reappraisal of evidence or disturbance of concurrent findings of fact except for perversity, illegality, impropriety, or no-evidence errors. The High Court may also consider relevant subsequent events and admit a local Commissioner&#039;s report on the present physical condition of the premises where those later facts directly affect whether the accommodation is fit for human habitation. On that basis, the report of deterioration was treated as admissible and the interference with the finding on fitness was justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194177</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>