<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (9) TMI 357 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194176</link>
    <description>The Court set aside previous orders and remitted the case to the High Court for fresh consideration of subsequent events raised by both parties. The High Court was directed to determine evidentiary requirements based on presented facts and dispose of the revision petition within three months, emphasizing the distinction between pleading and proof. No costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2018 14:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=487561" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (9) TMI 357 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194176</link>
      <description>The Court set aside previous orders and remitted the case to the High Court for fresh consideration of subsequent events raised by both parties. The High Court was directed to determine evidentiary requirements based on presented facts and dispose of the revision petition within three months, emphasizing the distinction between pleading and proof. No costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194176</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>