<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (7) TMI 6 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9734</link>
    <description>The Court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the Department cannot restrict the allowance to deductions under the remaining two parameters of section 44C if one parameter fails. The Court emphasized that when one parameter is not applicable, the entire section becomes non-workable, entitling the assessee to full deduction under section 37(1) of the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=48756" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (7) TMI 6 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9734</link>
      <description>The Court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the Department cannot restrict the allowance to deductions under the remaining two parameters of section 44C if one parameter fails. The Court emphasized that when one parameter is not applicable, the entire section becomes non-workable, entitling the assessee to full deduction under section 37(1) of the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9734</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>