<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1284 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347226</link>
    <description>Service tax could not be levied on club or association services for a period before the charging provision came into force, so that demand was unsustainable. Penalty was also set aside where tax had already been deposited before issue of the show cause notice, reflecting the settled position under the pre-notice payment provisions. The demand relating to convention or sponsorship charges was remanded because the adjudication order did not examine the nature of the receipts or their taxability. Penalty on mandap keeper services was cancelled on the same pre-notice payment basis, leaving only a partial remand for fresh adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2017 07:18:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=487548" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1284 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347226</link>
      <description>Service tax could not be levied on club or association services for a period before the charging provision came into force, so that demand was unsustainable. Penalty was also set aside where tax had already been deposited before issue of the show cause notice, reflecting the settled position under the pre-notice payment provisions. The demand relating to convention or sponsorship charges was remanded because the adjudication order did not examine the nature of the receipts or their taxability. Penalty on mandap keeper services was cancelled on the same pre-notice payment basis, leaving only a partial remand for fresh adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347226</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>