<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1281 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347223</link>
    <description>Container detention charges collected for retention of containers beyond the contractual or pre-holding period are not liable to service tax. The Board&#039;s circular clarified that such retention is neither a service provided on behalf of the client nor infrastructural support in the shipping line&#039;s or customer&#039;s business; the charges were treated as penal rent for delayed return of containers rather than consideration for a taxable service. On that basis, the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2017 07:18:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=487545" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1281 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347223</link>
      <description>Container detention charges collected for retention of containers beyond the contractual or pre-holding period are not liable to service tax. The Board&#039;s circular clarified that such retention is neither a service provided on behalf of the client nor infrastructural support in the shipping line&#039;s or customer&#039;s business; the charges were treated as penal rent for delayed return of containers rather than consideration for a taxable service. On that basis, the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347223</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>