https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347221 The Tribunal rejected the appellant's application to recall an order due to non-compliance with a pre-deposit order, emphasizing the importance of timely and diligent adherence to court orders. The appellant's belated full deposit, made two years after the initial dismissal of the appeal and under pressure from the Revenue, was deemed insufficient to warrant reinstatement. The Tribunal underscored the legal principle favoring vigilance over negligence, highlighting the consequences of delayed compliance in legal proceedings. en-us Mon, 26 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 31 Aug 2017 12:38:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347221 The Tribunal rejected the appellant's application to recall an order due to non-compliance with a pre-deposit order, emphasizing the importance of timely and diligent adherence to court orders. The appellant's belated full deposit, made two years after the initial dismissal of the appeal and under pressure from the Revenue, was deemed insufficient to warrant reinstatement. The Tribunal underscored the legal principle favoring vigilance over negligence, highlighting the consequences of delayed compliance in legal proceedings. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 26 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347221