https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347221 An application to recall dismissal of an appeal for non-compliance with a pre-deposit direction was rejected because the appellant deposited the amount only after a substantial delay, and only after notice under Section 87B of the Finance Act, 1994 had been issued. No extension of time was sought during the intervening period, and the delay showed lack of diligence in complying with the order. On these facts, the request for recall and restoration of the appeal was refused. en-us Mon, 26 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 31 Aug 2017 12:38:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347221 An application to recall dismissal of an appeal for non-compliance with a pre-deposit direction was rejected because the appellant deposited the amount only after a substantial delay, and only after notice under Section 87B of the Finance Act, 1994 had been issued. No extension of time was sought during the intervening period, and the delay showed lack of diligence in complying with the order. On these facts, the request for recall and restoration of the appeal was refused. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 26 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347221