<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1273 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347215</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the Order-in-Appeal allowing the refund claim, citing lack of scrutiny of documents, improper treatment of interest liability, and absence of confirmation by the Adjudicating Authority. The Tribunal upheld the respondent&#039;s contentions, finding the recovery of interest without due process and lack of authority for the amount&#039;s retrieval. The Tribunal also noted the finality of previous decisions on unjust enrichment, affirming the dismissal of Revenue&#039;s appeal and granting the respondent the opportunity for consequential relief as per the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2017 07:17:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=487537" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1273 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347215</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the Order-in-Appeal allowing the refund claim, citing lack of scrutiny of documents, improper treatment of interest liability, and absence of confirmation by the Adjudicating Authority. The Tribunal upheld the respondent&#039;s contentions, finding the recovery of interest without due process and lack of authority for the amount&#039;s retrieval. The Tribunal also noted the finality of previous decisions on unjust enrichment, affirming the dismissal of Revenue&#039;s appeal and granting the respondent the opportunity for consequential relief as per the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347215</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>