<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1271 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347213</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal with consequential relief. The decision emphasized the importance of adhering to the transaction value unless valid reasons exist for its rejection, stressing the need for consistency in valuation practices based on contemporaneous imports and legal provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2017 15:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=487535" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1271 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347213</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal with consequential relief. The decision emphasized the importance of adhering to the transaction value unless valid reasons exist for its rejection, stressing the need for consistency in valuation practices based on contemporaneous imports and legal provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347213</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>