<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (8) TMI 80 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9730</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 48.98 lakhs made by the Assessing Officer, finding no evidence of tax avoidance or manipulation. Additionally, the Court ruled that the deduction under section 80-I should be computed on the total income without excluding any deduction under section 80HH, in line with previous court decisions. The Court favored the assessee in both issues, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s arguments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 20:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=48752" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (8) TMI 80 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9730</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 48.98 lakhs made by the Assessing Officer, finding no evidence of tax avoidance or manipulation. Additionally, the Court ruled that the deduction under section 80-I should be computed on the total income without excluding any deduction under section 80HH, in line with previous court decisions. The Court favored the assessee in both issues, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s arguments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9730</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>