<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1440 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194161</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, emphasizing that the delay in allotting the service tax code by the Department cannot be a ground for rejecting the refund claim. The appellant had fulfilled the necessary requirements as per the notification, and the refund should be processed accordingly. The decision highlights the importance of adherence to procedural requirements and timely processing of refund claims to ensure justice and fairness in tax matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2017 07:09:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=487517" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1440 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194161</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, emphasizing that the delay in allotting the service tax code by the Department cannot be a ground for rejecting the refund claim. The appellant had fulfilled the necessary requirements as per the notification, and the refund should be processed accordingly. The decision highlights the importance of adherence to procedural requirements and timely processing of refund claims to ensure justice and fairness in tax matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194161</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>