<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1355 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194165</link>
    <description>Under the CENVAT Credit Rules, credit and refund of unutilised input credit may be available where exempted or nil-duty goods are exported, because the expression &quot;excisable goods&quot; is broader than &quot;exempted goods&quot;. The Bombay HC noted that this position was already covered by Drish Shoes Ltd., a precedent relied on by the Tribunal and confirmed by the Supreme Court. It also recorded that the objection based on Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 was not raised before the lower forums and was therefore not entertained. On that basis, no substantial question of law arose in the Department&#039;s challenge.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2017 07:09:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=487513" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1355 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194165</link>
      <description>Under the CENVAT Credit Rules, credit and refund of unutilised input credit may be available where exempted or nil-duty goods are exported, because the expression &quot;excisable goods&quot; is broader than &quot;exempted goods&quot;. The Bombay HC noted that this position was already covered by Drish Shoes Ltd., a precedent relied on by the Tribunal and confirmed by the Supreme Court. It also recorded that the objection based on Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 was not raised before the lower forums and was therefore not entertained. On that basis, no substantial question of law arose in the Department&#039;s challenge.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194165</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>