<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1442 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194169</link>
    <description>The High Court of Karnataka upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the Revenue, ruling against the assessee. The Court emphasized the importance of maintaining accounts in accordance with the Companies Act for computing book profits under section 115JB of the Income-tax Act. It reiterated the limited power of the Assessing Officer to make adjustments to the profit and loss account and clarified that deductions not within the Explanation to section 115JB are not considered for computing book profits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2017 07:09:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=487509" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1442 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194169</link>
      <description>The High Court of Karnataka upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the Revenue, ruling against the assessee. The Court emphasized the importance of maintaining accounts in accordance with the Companies Act for computing book profits under section 115JB of the Income-tax Act. It reiterated the limited power of the Assessing Officer to make adjustments to the profit and loss account and clarified that deductions not within the Explanation to section 115JB are not considered for computing book profits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194169</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>