<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1605 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194172</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, and the revision order under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act was set aside. The Tribunal held that the assessment order was not erroneous or prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue, as the substantive addition and tax payment were made by the estate of late Shri V.C. Mehta.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2017 07:09:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=487506" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1605 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194172</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, and the revision order under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act was set aside. The Tribunal held that the assessment order was not erroneous or prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue, as the substantive addition and tax payment were made by the estate of late Shri V.C. Mehta.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194172</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>