<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (4) TMI 30 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9728</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the Revenue in both issues. The incentive received by the assessee was considered a revenue receipt and taxable. The unpaid production incentive bonus was disallowed as a deduction under section 43B since it was not paid during the relevant assessment year. The court emphasized adherence to legal principles and statutory provisions in determining the tax treatment based on the nature of receipts and timing of payments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 20:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=48750" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (4) TMI 30 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9728</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the Revenue in both issues. The incentive received by the assessee was considered a revenue receipt and taxable. The unpaid production incentive bonus was disallowed as a deduction under section 43B since it was not paid during the relevant assessment year. The court emphasized adherence to legal principles and statutory provisions in determining the tax treatment based on the nature of receipts and timing of payments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9728</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>