<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1252 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347194</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, finding that the disallowances made by the Assessing Officer were not justified as they were based on surmises and conjectures without proper consideration of relevant evidence. The tribunal emphasized that the AO failed to prove the payments were excessive or unreasonable. The order was pronounced in the Open Court on 18th August 2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2017 18:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=487487" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1252 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347194</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, finding that the disallowances made by the Assessing Officer were not justified as they were based on surmises and conjectures without proper consideration of relevant evidence. The tribunal emphasized that the AO failed to prove the payments were excessive or unreasonable. The order was pronounced in the Open Court on 18th August 2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347194</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>