<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1250 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347192</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the interpretation of the limitation period under section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing the importance of the date of passing the order in calculating the period for seeking a recall. The application for recall was dismissed as it was filed beyond the limitation period, regardless of the date considered for calculating the limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2017 18:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=487482" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1250 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347192</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the interpretation of the limitation period under section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing the importance of the date of passing the order in calculating the period for seeking a recall. The application for recall was dismissed as it was filed beyond the limitation period, regardless of the date considered for calculating the limitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347192</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>