<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1241 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347183</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on both issues. It found the reopening of assessment under section 147 unjustified, stating that the attempt to disallow interest again was impermissible. The Tribunal upheld the decision of the First Appellate Authority regarding the disallowance of interest under section 40(a)(ia), emphasizing that since the interest amount had already been disallowed in the original assessment, further disallowance was unnecessary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2017 17:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=487469" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1241 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347183</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on both issues. It found the reopening of assessment under section 147 unjustified, stating that the attempt to disallow interest again was impermissible. The Tribunal upheld the decision of the First Appellate Authority regarding the disallowance of interest under section 40(a)(ia), emphasizing that since the interest amount had already been disallowed in the original assessment, further disallowance was unnecessary.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347183</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>