https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347178 The Tribunal upheld the addition of Rs. 16,07,000 based on the District Valuation Officer's valuation but deleted the enhancement of income by Rs. 6,66,93,021 by the CIT(A) due to lack of incriminating material supporting unaccounted consideration. The appeal was partly allowed, with the Tribunal finding in favor of the assessee on the issue of enhanced income. en-us Tue, 11 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 30 Aug 2017 16:48:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347178 The Tribunal upheld the addition of Rs. 16,07,000 based on the District Valuation Officer's valuation but deleted the enhancement of income by Rs. 6,66,93,021 by the CIT(A) due to lack of incriminating material supporting unaccounted consideration. The appeal was partly allowed, with the Tribunal finding in favor of the assessee on the issue of enhanced income. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 11 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347178