<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (2) TMI 107 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9724</link>
    <description>A civil court decree rectifying a trust deed operates only prospectively and does not alter the tax position for earlier assessment years. Applying that rule, the Tribunal treated the trust&#039;s exemption claim as available only from the date of the 29 April 1981 decree and not for prior periods under the Gift-tax Act. The Revenue&#039;s challenge failed, and the exemption granted for the relevant gift-tax year was left undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 19:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=48746" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (2) TMI 107 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9724</link>
      <description>A civil court decree rectifying a trust deed operates only prospectively and does not alter the tax position for earlier assessment years. Applying that rule, the Tribunal treated the trust&#039;s exemption claim as available only from the date of the 29 April 1981 decree and not for prior periods under the Gift-tax Act. The Revenue&#039;s challenge failed, and the exemption granted for the relevant gift-tax year was left undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9724</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>