<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 1092 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194154</link>
    <description>The High Court remitted the matter to the Assessing Officer to determine the disallowance under Section 14A in accordance with the Division Bench decision, emphasizing the need to adhere to Section 14A despite Rule 8D not being applicable. The Court highlighted the principle of consistency in determining disallowances under Section 14A and referenced previous rejections of such claims by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2017 15:44:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=487458" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 1092 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194154</link>
      <description>The High Court remitted the matter to the Assessing Officer to determine the disallowance under Section 14A in accordance with the Division Bench decision, emphasizing the need to adhere to Section 14A despite Rule 8D not being applicable. The Court highlighted the principle of consistency in determining disallowances under Section 14A and referenced previous rejections of such claims by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194154</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>