https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194152 The High Court upheld the Trial Court's acquittal of the Respondent in a case challenging the charge under Section 56(1)(ii) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act 1973. The Court clarified that disobedience of summons does not amount to contravention of FERA provisions, citing a Kerala High Court decision. The Court found that the Appellant's actions in serving the summons were in accordance with the law. As a result, the appeal was dismissed, and the Respondent's acquittal was maintained. en-us Fri, 29 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 30 Aug 2017 14:34:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194152 The High Court upheld the Trial Court's acquittal of the Respondent in a case challenging the charge under Section 56(1)(ii) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act 1973. The Court clarified that disobedience of summons does not amount to contravention of FERA provisions, citing a Kerala High Court decision. The Court found that the Appellant's actions in serving the summons were in accordance with the law. As a result, the appeal was dismissed, and the Respondent's acquittal was maintained. Case-Laws FEMA Fri, 29 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194152