<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (3) TMI 769 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194147</link>
    <description>The court set aside the orders dated 19.01.2004 and 15.03.2004 due to unjustified delays caused by repeated adjournments in filing the written statement. The petitioner was directed to pay costs to the respondent and provide a copy of the written statement promptly. The trial court was instructed to expedite the hearing considering the case&#039;s age, leading to the disposal of related applications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2017 13:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=487435" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (3) TMI 769 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194147</link>
      <description>The court set aside the orders dated 19.01.2004 and 15.03.2004 due to unjustified delays caused by repeated adjournments in filing the written statement. The petitioner was directed to pay costs to the respondent and provide a copy of the written statement promptly. The trial court was instructed to expedite the hearing considering the case&#039;s age, leading to the disposal of related applications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194147</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>