https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194143 The judgment concluded that the petitioner had engaged in forum shopping and various complaints, but the respondents' actions did not oppress the petitioner. While some actions were improper, the court directed the petitioner to have the option to sell her shares at a fair price determined by a valuer appointed by the Board based on the company's balance sheet as of 31-3-2001. No costs were ordered. en-us Thu, 27 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 30 Aug 2017 11:00:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194143 The judgment concluded that the petitioner had engaged in forum shopping and various complaints, but the respondents' actions did not oppress the petitioner. While some actions were improper, the court directed the petitioner to have the option to sell her shares at a fair price determined by a valuer appointed by the Board based on the company's balance sheet as of 31-3-2001. No costs were ordered. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 27 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194143