https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194131 The Tribunal allowed the restoration application filed by a municipality whose appeal was dismissed for non-compliance with a pre-deposit order. Despite opposition from the revenue, citing past cases of denied restoration due to delayed payment, the Tribunal found no deliberate delay by the appellant and granted the restoration. The appeal was reinstated, and further recovery by the revenue was prohibited during the appeal's pendency. The Tribunal withdrew all attachment orders, set a final hearing date, and emphasized consistency with previous decisions. en-us Tue, 30 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 30 Aug 2017 10:56:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194131 The Tribunal allowed the restoration application filed by a municipality whose appeal was dismissed for non-compliance with a pre-deposit order. Despite opposition from the revenue, citing past cases of denied restoration due to delayed payment, the Tribunal found no deliberate delay by the appellant and granted the restoration. The appeal was reinstated, and further recovery by the revenue was prohibited during the appeal's pendency. The Tribunal withdrew all attachment orders, set a final hearing date, and emphasized consistency with previous decisions. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 30 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194131