<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1353 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194132</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the show cause notices were not validly served as required by the provisions of the Act and Rules. Consequently, the impugned orders were deemed not tenable and were set aside. The appellant was granted entitlement to consequential benefits, if any, in accordance with the law. The miscellaneous application for early hearing was also disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2017 10:56:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=487420" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1353 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194132</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the show cause notices were not validly served as required by the provisions of the Act and Rules. Consequently, the impugned orders were deemed not tenable and were set aside. The appellant was granted entitlement to consequential benefits, if any, in accordance with the law. The miscellaneous application for early hearing was also disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194132</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>