<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 1189 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194137</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Company Law Board&#039;s decision to deny interim reliefs in a case involving challenges to Board Meeting and AGM procedures, allegations of oppression and mismanagement, legality of paper ballot votes, and the ouster of a Director. The Court directed expedited disposal of the main petition within three months, emphasizing the need for a full trial to substantiate the allegations. Appeals were dismissed, and related petitions closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2017 10:56:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=487415" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 1189 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194137</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Company Law Board&#039;s decision to deny interim reliefs in a case involving challenges to Board Meeting and AGM procedures, allegations of oppression and mismanagement, legality of paper ballot votes, and the ouster of a Director. The Court directed expedited disposal of the main petition within three months, emphasizing the need for a full trial to substantiate the allegations. Appeals were dismissed, and related petitions closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194137</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>