<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 1095 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194138</link>
    <description>The court resolved the dispute by accepting the arrangement proposed by the parties, allowing the Metal Scrap Trade Corporation Limited (MSTC Ltd.) to conduct the auction of goods. The parties agreed to disclose necessary details for setting the reserve price and expedite the auction process for the sale of aircraft, ensuring completion by a specified date. The judgment emphasized that the arrangement was specific to the case and not a precedent for future cases, aiming to facilitate the timely sale of the goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2017 10:56:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=487414" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 1095 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194138</link>
      <description>The court resolved the dispute by accepting the arrangement proposed by the parties, allowing the Metal Scrap Trade Corporation Limited (MSTC Ltd.) to conduct the auction of goods. The parties agreed to disclose necessary details for setting the reserve price and expedite the auction process for the sale of aircraft, ensuring completion by a specified date. The judgment emphasized that the arrangement was specific to the case and not a precedent for future cases, aiming to facilitate the timely sale of the goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194138</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>