<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1439 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194139</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Service Tax levy for lease periods 2013-14 and 2014-15. However, it directed the respondent to consider the petitioner&#039;s reply and issue appropriate orders within four weeks. The court highlighted the importance of responding to petitioner representations, especially in cases involving significant tax amounts. The legal proceedings regarding the Service Tax levy for the mentioned lease periods concluded with the dismissal of the writ petition without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2017 10:56:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=487413" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1439 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194139</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Service Tax levy for lease periods 2013-14 and 2014-15. However, it directed the respondent to consider the petitioner&#039;s reply and issue appropriate orders within four weeks. The court highlighted the importance of responding to petitioner representations, especially in cases involving significant tax amounts. The legal proceedings regarding the Service Tax levy for the mentioned lease periods concluded with the dismissal of the writ petition without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194139</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>