https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194141 Devolution or assignment of interest in property during the pendency of a proceeding does not by itself extinguish the right of the original party to continue the appeal. Order XXII Rule 10 CPC permits the proceeding to continue by or against the person upon whom the interest has devolved, and Order XXII Rule 11 applies the same principle to appeals; dismissal merely because the assignee did not seek impleadment is not warranted. The original appellant may proceed, while the assignee may independently seek to come on record. en-us Wed, 23 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 30 Aug 2017 10:56:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194141 Devolution or assignment of interest in property during the pendency of a proceeding does not by itself extinguish the right of the original party to continue the appeal. Order XXII Rule 10 CPC permits the proceeding to continue by or against the person upon whom the interest has devolved, and Order XXII Rule 11 applies the same principle to appeals; dismissal merely because the assignee did not seek impleadment is not warranted. The original appellant may proceed, while the assignee may independently seek to come on record. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 23 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194141