https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347166 The Court dismissed the appeal due to an extraordinary delay of 1825 days in filing the appeal against the CESTAT order dated 14th October 2011. The Appellant's reasons for delay, including medical grounds and personal circumstances, were considered but deemed insufficient. The Court emphasized the importance of diligence in pursuing legal remedies and noted the lack of follow-up on previous attempts to challenge the dismissal of the appeal in 2009. Despite recognizing the potential consequences for the Appellant, the Court declined to condone the substantial delay, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. en-us Tue, 22 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Feb 2018 13:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347166 The Court dismissed the appeal due to an extraordinary delay of 1825 days in filing the appeal against the CESTAT order dated 14th October 2011. The Appellant's reasons for delay, including medical grounds and personal circumstances, were considered but deemed insufficient. The Court emphasized the importance of diligence in pursuing legal remedies and noted the lack of follow-up on previous attempts to challenge the dismissal of the appeal in 2009. Despite recognizing the potential consequences for the Appellant, the Court declined to condone the substantial delay, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 22 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347166