https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347165 The Court held in favor of the Revenue in an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, directing CESTAT to re-examine the duty demand issue involving two entities. Emphasizing strict adherence to appeal procedures, the Court found impleadment of parties crucial, dismissing concerns about penalty imposition and locus standi. The judgment addressed the necessity of impleading all parties in appeals against common orders and confirmed that all relevant parties were duly notified and represented during proceedings. The Court's analysis covered impleadment, jurisdiction, duty segregation, appeal procedures, penalty concerns, locus standi, and CESTAT's material analysis. en-us Fri, 28 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 30 Dec 2017 16:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347165 The Court held in favor of the Revenue in an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, directing CESTAT to re-examine the duty demand issue involving two entities. Emphasizing strict adherence to appeal procedures, the Court found impleadment of parties crucial, dismissing concerns about penalty imposition and locus standi. The judgment addressed the necessity of impleading all parties in appeals against common orders and confirmed that all relevant parties were duly notified and represented during proceedings. The Court's analysis covered impleadment, jurisdiction, duty segregation, appeal procedures, penalty concerns, locus standi, and CESTAT's material analysis. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 28 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347165