https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347164 The court allowed the Writ Petition, setting aside the 2001 order due to lack of jurisdiction of the revisional authority under Section 35EE of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The court considered the binding effect of a decision by the Punjab and Haryana High Court, which had been challenged in the Supreme Court and dismissed. Consequently, the impugned order was deemed invalid, and the Writ Petition was granted without costs. en-us Mon, 10 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 30 Aug 2017 07:34:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347164 The court allowed the Writ Petition, setting aside the 2001 order due to lack of jurisdiction of the revisional authority under Section 35EE of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The court considered the binding effect of a decision by the Punjab and Haryana High Court, which had been challenged in the Supreme Court and dismissed. Consequently, the impugned order was deemed invalid, and the Writ Petition was granted without costs. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 10 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347164