<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1208 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347150</link>
    <description>The appeals of the assessees were allowed, and those of the Department were rejected. The judgment set aside the impugned order, citing the settled legal position, and granted consequential relief to the assessees in accordance with the law. The court concluded the matter by affirming the allowance of appeals and disposal of cross objections, based on established legal principles and interpretations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2017 07:33:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=487368" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1208 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347150</link>
      <description>The appeals of the assessees were allowed, and those of the Department were rejected. The judgment set aside the impugned order, citing the settled legal position, and granted consequential relief to the assessees in accordance with the law. The court concluded the matter by affirming the allowance of appeals and disposal of cross objections, based on established legal principles and interpretations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347150</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>