<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1199 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347141</link>
    <description>The petition was dismissed on the grounds of maintainability as the petitioner failed to provide sufficient evidence of shareholding in the 1st respondent company. The Tribunal did not address the merits of the case due to this preliminary issue. The dismissal does not preclude the petitioner from pursuing other legal remedies. The petition was dismissed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2017 07:32:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=487359" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1199 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347141</link>
      <description>The petition was dismissed on the grounds of maintainability as the petitioner failed to provide sufficient evidence of shareholding in the 1st respondent company. The Tribunal did not address the merits of the case due to this preliminary issue. The dismissal does not preclude the petitioner from pursuing other legal remedies. The petition was dismissed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347141</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>