<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1196 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347138</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court directed the installation of CCTV cameras in courts in two districts of every State/Union Territory to enhance transparency and governance. It emphasized the importance of public trials for fair justice administration. Privacy concerns were addressed, noting that footage would not be publicly accessible. High Courts&#039; jurisdiction to supervise subordinate courts was discussed, with a focus on the benefits of audio recording. The Court mandated uniform technical specifications and pricing for installation, extending the requirement to Tribunals. High Courts were required to submit installation progress reports, with further monitoring scheduled.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2017 14:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=487356" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1196 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347138</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court directed the installation of CCTV cameras in courts in two districts of every State/Union Territory to enhance transparency and governance. It emphasized the importance of public trials for fair justice administration. Privacy concerns were addressed, noting that footage would not be publicly accessible. High Courts&#039; jurisdiction to supervise subordinate courts was discussed, with a focus on the benefits of audio recording. The Court mandated uniform technical specifications and pricing for installation, extending the requirement to Tribunals. High Courts were required to submit installation progress reports, with further monitoring scheduled.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347138</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>